Dealing with dilemmas
It has been said, and wisely so, that it is a company’s values that underpin
its approach to and understanding of sustainable development.
In the
case of Novo Nordisk, this statement rings a truth that echoes back to when the
company was founded in a basement nearly 80 years ago.
We have been
pursuing a consistent approach to implementing the Triple Bottom Line – social
and environmental responsibility, and economic viability – for more than a
decade, and we report annually on our performance.
Our core values, the
backbone of our business, have remained unchanged even in turbulent times.
Through dedication to our vision, we feel that each day we are coming a bit
closer to the ultimate goal: to defeat diabetes.
It makes a difference
whether you live by your values, or merely talk about them. It also makes a
difference whether corporate values are consistent with your personal view of
the world. Put to the test,
this is the ultimate determinant of success or
failure.
We believe that a consistent, value-guided approach will
maintain our position as a leader. Reputation counts, and one of the things that
really matter is the recognition by our own employees. In the most recent
employee survey, 85% agreed with the statement “Novo Nordisk’s results within
the social and environmental area are important to the future of the
company”.
We recognise the fact that we may do business while combating
diabetes. We endorse and promote collaboration with research institutions across
the world to find better ways of treatment and prevention, and between parties
in the healthcare system to make treatment affordable, available and
accessible.
A new regime is usually
judged by its first hundred days in office. I began my term when Novo Nordisk
had just been reorganised as a focused healthcare company, better shaped to meet
the expectations of our customers, our employees and our shareholders.
A fine start which was followed by tough times when a strong coalition of
NGOs challenged the
entire pharmaceutical industry on how we do
business. On our home turf, our company was attacked in the Danish media in
the early spring of 2001 for joining the pharmaceutical industry’s legal action
against the South African government.
We saw globalisation transformed
into a war between ‘good and evil’, between rich and poor, and between big
business and individual human rights. It exposed some of the very difficult
dilemmas we need to deal with as a corporate citizen in a complex
world.
At the time, I was quoted as saying that “we are not a humanitarian
organisation”. We cannot just
give away our products, or give up our intellectual
property. Yet we have made a promise of ‘being there’ for those who need the
care and the treatment we can provide. With that promise our company has an
extraordinary obligation to help facilitate better access to proper diabetes
care in the poorest nations.
We cannot
keep up with the pace of diabetes. Even if we wanted to, we cannot supply
essential care to the more than 150 million people suffering from the disease
today. We need to develop new, sustainable business models. The future of
millions of people – and that of the company – demands active intervention to
change the dire reality in these countries by giving direct help via product
supply and affordable pricing, along with investments in building diabetes care
infrastructure.
To present a targeted and focused strategy to fight diabetes globally, we
have launched an
ambitious plan to address the urgent issue of improving
access to health for all people.
The Novo Nordisk LEAD initiative –
Leadership in Education and Access to Diabetes care – is our
response to
ensuring better access to global healthcare. One element of the LEAD
initiative
is the establishment
of the
World
Diabetes Foundation ,
through which the
company will donate approximately DKK 500 million over the next ten
years.
Before we could make this significant financial
commitment, we obviously needed our shareholders’ support. I am happy to say
that my consultations with our major institutional investors brought an
affirmative response. They, too, are concerned. They, too, expect us to act on
our responsibility as a global corporate citizen.
This concern is shared
by our employees, our business partners, our customers, NGOs and other key
stakeholders. We know, because we frequently consult them on these
issues.
Alleviating poverty is the greatest challenge for sustainable development.
Economic inequality
is rising rapidly. The
anti-globalisation movement is one response to that. So is the increasing
commitment to corporate social responsibility.
In changing times we need to make new commitments and build more partnerships
with
those who share the same vision. In a perfect world, the
business of business may well be business. Yet the events of the year have
certainly reminded me – like everyone else – that the world is far from
perfect.
It needs a lot more work and a greater commitment by everyone subscribing to
the values of
democracy, tolerance and
personal integrity.
So while I still do not see our company as a
not-for-profit humanitarian organisation, we can be a humane company – a company
with a heart.
Lars Rebien Sørensen, president & CEO